Winds of War: Thinking About the Unthinkable – Part 1: Civil War In Europe

I still stand on the statement that ‘real war’ will start when the free world finally awakes from its Islamist induced slumber. When the war arrives, it will be succinct, clear to everyone and with a focused objective - as it did for Europe on September 1st, 1939 and America on December 7th, 1941.

In my opinion and many others, this is the shape of the war to come in three parts.

Militaristic: Like all other wars, there will be a theater of battle across the globe.
Demographic: Civil war in Europe between the Islamists and native Europeans.
Economic: To defeat America they will attempt to seriously damage our economic and social infrastructure and have us sue for peace.

In this three part series we’ll look at each of these ‘battle fronts’ and see how they may play out.

Today’s installment is civil war in Europe.

Currently, appeasement is the order of the day in Europe. In an article entitled ‘This time the crocodile won't wait’, a review by Spengler of Melanie Phillips book, Londonistan, speaks of the hopes and fears of the appeaser.

“In retrospect, it seems oafish of Neville Chamberlain, Britain's prime minister in 1938, to have betrayed Czechoslovakia to Nazi rule in return for the empty promise of peace. Yet an overwhelming English majority looked with horror on the prospect of confrontation with Germany and a new world war, until Adolf Hitler forced England's hand by invading Poland. "The appeaser hopes the crocodile will eat him last," said Winston Churchill. Today's crocodiles may not be so patient. The opposing voices in 1938 rang lonely and shrill just as they do today.”
In her book, Phillips portrays an emasculated Britain ashamed of its own national identity and anxious to appease the "clerical fascism" of the jihadis.

Britain, Phillips warns, is reaping what it has sown. A large minority of British Muslims are disaffected at best and seditious at worst. Phillips cites a 2004 Home Office survey finding that 26% of British Muslims felt no loyalty to Britain, 13% supported terrorism, and about 1% (up to 20,000 individuals) were "actively engaged" in terrorism or support for terrorism. Another poll found that 32% of British Muslims agreed that "Western society is decadent and immoral and that Muslims should seek to bring it to an end".

Phillips believes that in the event of a violent collision between the West and Iran, for example, civil conflict might arise in Britain on a scale resembling that in Northern Ireland in the 1970s. I believe I will be much worse and more along the lines of the Spanish Civil War of the mid to late 1930s. A conflict in which the incumbent Second Spanish Republic and political left-wing groups fought against a right-wing nationalist insurrection led by General Francisco Franco, who eventually succeeded in ousting the Republican government and establishing a personal dictatorship.

Spengler adds, “The battle front in Europe will be based not on traditional warfare but through cultural infiltration where the Islamists exploit the democratic spaces within our society and insert their religious dogma via our own societal modes. And when Islam oversteps and the ignorant Westerners protest, Islam screams, “Racism, Xenophobia”, and the gatekeepers of Western culture rollover and go back to sleep.”

The Brussels Journal keys in with this.

The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations is so extremely high that it is difficult to view these rapes as merely random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This is happening in most Western European countries, as well as in other non-Muslim countries such as India. European jails are filling up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes and Muslims bomb European civilians. One can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That is because they cannot, or do not want to, see the obvious: this is exactly how an invading army would behave: rape, pillage and bombing. If many of the Muslim immigrants see themselves as conquerors in a war, it all makes perfect sense.

The prized goal of today’s appeaser is multiculturalism and multiculturalism is the flag of the appeaser just as the ‘peace at any cost’ was the flag of the appeasers in the 1930s.
Europe is facing an insurgency no different from what’s happening in Iraq – just not fully violent yet.

Swedish blogger Fjordman writes, “As Mark Steyn points out, the Jihad in the streets of France looks increasingly like the early skirmishes of an impending Eurabian civil war, brought on by massive Muslim immigration and multicultural stupidity. And it is by no means limited to France. Law and order is slowly breaking down in major and even minor cities across the European continent, and the streets are ruled by aggressive gangs of Muslim youngsters. Countries such as France, Holland and Sweden could soon reach a point where the Muslim population will create something akin to civil war, as it already has in the above mentioned nations. Even though this conflict may start out as civil wars in a handful of countries, it could spiral out of control and spread too much of the continent, dragging in foreign fighters from the Arab world.”

This civil war between Europeans and Muslim immigrants who have had success of imposing their kind of civilization on Europe is the result, Fjordman says “of today's decadent, bored, post-religious and post-nationalist Europe that is no match for Islam, unless it rediscovers a belief in its own culture and a will to defend it. If not, the end result will either be Eurabia or a Pakistanization of Europe, the way we have already seen for generations in the Balkans.” The Pakistanization of Europe is one such scenario he sees for Europe.

“Muslims aren't numerous enough to control the entire continent. In the event of war, there will be mutual ethnic cleansing and Muslims will seize parts of Western Europe. For instance, a belt stretching from parts of Germany via Belgium and Holland to France, but maybe even regions within certain nation states. All of Europe will not be lost, but some parts will, and many others will be deeply damaged by the fighting. Many of our cultural treasures will burn. How things will go from there is difficult to predict. Perhaps this new "Pakistan" in the heart of Europe will be the source of constant instability and the staging ground for Jihad incursions into infidel areas, just as Pakistan is to India now.”

Fjordman believes that the spark for the civil war many happen in one of two ways.

“It will start, as these things always do, before anyone is ready. It may start more or less by accident. This war may begin with the murder of a symbolic but politically unimportant figure. Or a reverse scenario is possible. A nationalist or rightist murders a prominent Islamic figure, sparking a wave of Islamic terror across Europe. Another possibility is a mega-attack, a chemical weapon or simply a massive suicide bomb or wave of bombs that succeed beyond the bombers plans and kills thousands and/or destroys symbolically important targets, a cathedral, a museum, the Channel. The fearful public then demands harsh government action. Some governments act; others are paralyzed and are incapable of taking action causing citizens to defend themselves.”

In other words – chaos and civil insurrection against the feeble social liberal multiculturalists who are unable to respond to the attacks as they do today. Fjordman speaks of the real danger of this.

Once a full-blown civil war starts in one country, it can, and probably will, spread to other countries. We are now witnessing an example of this, as smaller "sympathy riots" have been staged by Muslims in Belgium, Holland, Germany and Denmark following the unrest in France.
But that’s not the half of it. The real threat is a rise of neo-Fascism in Europe to counteract the impotence of the socialist liberal in power and in defense of European civilization. A Charles Martel – or even worse – and other Adolf Hitler may arise in Europe – shades of the 1930s.

Fjordman says, “This situation could trigger the rise of neo-Fascism and neo-nationalism, and maybe the downfall of European democracy. European neo-nationalism will most likely be hostile to US interests and downright anti-Semitic. None of this will be pretty. The violence will be up-close and quite personal.

Europe’s neo-nationalist future will be one filled with paranoia and fanaticism and blind, desperate struggle.

In reality, there may be a The Clash of Fascisms. In the civil war that will ensue:

”There would be a widespread feeling that Europe is descending into chaos, and that the governments are unwilling or incapable of stopping this. If this situation continues, some people will cry out for a Strong Man to “cleanse Europe of foreigners" and restore its honor and wounded pride. And He will step forward. By then, you won’t have a “Clash of Civilizations” in Europe, but rather a Clash of Fascisms: Euro-Fascism vs. Islamo-Fascism.”

Is civil war in Europe inevitable? That depends on the Europeans and if they awaken to the ticking bomb that’s under their feet.