Thursday, May 31, 2007

Storm Track Appeasement: Democrats Backing Bill Granting Legal Rights to Terrorists

“No people in history have ever survived who thought they could protect their freedom by making themselves inoffensive to their enemies.”
Dean Acheson

The ignorance of the Left knows no bounds. Just how long will the left continue to see this war against Islamism as just a criminal investigation? How much longer will they stick their heads in the sand while helping our enemies to defeat us – or as Lenin once said, “The West will sell us the rope to hang them with.”

The most recent example of the Left’s ignorance of the threat is being proposed by Democrats in the Senate.

Senate Democrats are backing a bill that would grant new legal rights to terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including the right to a lawyer regardless of whether the prisoners are put on trial. The proposal, approved this week by the Senate Armed Services Committee, also would narrow the definition of an enemy combatant and tighten restrictions on the types of evidence used to keep a person detained.

The legislation has caused alarm at the White House, which considers it a potential veto target, and among congressional Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, who said he was concerned that aspects of the bill may go too far. "Any changes have to meet the test for me that they will not compromise our ability to wage war," Graham said Friday.

You’re talking to the dead, Sen. Graham. The Democrats don’t believe we’re at war. Never did and most likely never will. It’s not politically correct. They can’t even come up with a name for it. Courtesy of John Edwards.

"We need a post-Bush, post-9/11, post-Iraq military that is mission focused on protecting Americans from 21st century threats, not misused for discredited ideological purposes," Edwards said in remarks prepared for delivery. "By framing this as a war, we have walked right into the trap the terrorists have set—that we are engaged in some kind of clash of civilizations and a war on Islam."

Poor deluded fools. Deluded but not stupid. Dems know how to use the troops to advance their politically correct agenda.

Democratic Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, tucked the new detainee measure into a $649 billion defense policy bill for budget year that begins Oct. 1.

The committee bill was drafted in private and approved by a 25-0 vote. Sens. Graham, Warner and McCain, now the top Republican on the committee, raised no formal objections to the detainee provisions. "I am open to making the process better," Graham said, but "it has to meet the test that we're in a shooting war."


Good luck convincing the Dems, Sen. Graham. Seeing this conflict as a shooting war is the direct opposite of how the Democrats see it.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Storm Track Infiltration: The Global Insurgence of Islamism –Who’s Really Responsibile?

I’ve written before of how the Islamist global insurgency threats both non-Muslim and Muslim countries alike and that the struggle today is with the ideology of Islamism not Islam itself. Outside of the mid-East, Muslims have more or less lived in peace within multicultural societies like Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia which has the world’s greatest population of Muslims.

But over the last several years, the Islamist insurgency has gained ground and turning these once peaceful multicultural countries into a battleground.

Who’s responsible for this? This article gives us a clue. Thai military says beheadings by local Muslim insurgents inspired by jihad videos.

Jihad training videos from the Middle East, captured in southern Thailand, may be inspiring local Muslim insurgents to carry out grisly beheadings, officials said Monday.

About 30 people, both Buddhist and Muslim, have been beheaded since the revival of a separatist Muslim insurgency in early 2004 in Thailand's southernmost provinces.


Middle East Arab countries are responsible for spreading the jihadist’s ideology. Yet our political leaders turn a blind eye to this obvious campaign to turn moderate Muslim nations into rabid Islamic fundamentalists. Why? Oil of course. And the long reach of the global Islamic insurgency will continue fed by petro-dollars gladly and willingly contributed by the world’s democracies.

The solution? What many have been saying since the 1970s but little had been done. Get us off the foreign oil tit and treat this extortion by the Arabs and their socialist allies in South America as a form of warfare – which it is – and place this country on a war footing doing everything in our power to get us from under the heel of the enemy oil cartel.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Storm Track Disinformation: Muslims to Free World – Broaden Your Concept of Democracy

Muslim intellectuals will go to no length to confuse the infidel. One such tactic to keep the infidel off balance is the constant comparison of Islam to democracy as if the two could coexist. But the Muslim intellectual always makes a semantic slip that shows the true nature of the misunderstanding between democracy and Islam.

"What is needed is a broadening of the concept of democracy and respect for other cultures and civilizations outside the narrow Western perspective," said Rashwan, who is the director of the Comparative Politics Unit at the Al Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies and editor-in-chief of Directory of World Islamic Movements.

First, who is Rashwan?

Islam and democracy are not mutually exclusive concepts, argues Diaa Rashwan, an Egyptian specialist on Islamist ideology and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Catch that? The Muslim Brotherhood. The very same Brotherhood that’s currently going to great lengths promoting itself as a democratic movement in Islam – the very same organization that is pursing a plan to Islamatize the world.

Back to the first quote – "What is needed is a broadening of the concept of democracy and respect for other cultures and civilizations outside the narrow Western perspective.” Excuse me! Broaden the concept of democracy? The narrow Western perspective? What is this clown talking about?

The definition of a true democracy is very simple.

1- It a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

2- It is a secular government separated ruled by under the laws of man while at the some time protecting one’s practice of their beliefs.

3- It is a government that protects the basic freedoms of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

A government ‘broadened’ to include the concepts of Islamic laws which Rashwan is referring to is no democracy at all.

And the usual Islamic demand.

"There is genuine desire for democracy in Egypt and Egyptians are politically moderate by nature, so there is little danger of Islamic fanaticism taking hold. But this democracy will not come at the expense of our culture and traditions and that is something the West has to accept."

And by cultural traditions he means the rule by Sharia Law and here’s why that’s antithetical to democracy.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Monday, May 28, 2007

Storm Track Intimidation: Muslims Offended Again – This Time in South Africa

It never ceases to amazes me how Muslims, no matter where they are located, find something to be offended by and why we should care. On the negative side they are a constant source of irritation. On the positive side they are a constant source of morbid entertainment.

It seems the Muslim Judicial Council of South Africa is all a tizzy over the annual Matric Ball – the SA version of our Prom.

Matric balls, whether hosted during the month of Ramadan or not, are not endorsed by Islam, says the Muslim Judicial Council (MJC).

The statement comes after weekend reports that Muslim pupils at the South African College Schools (SACS) were up in arms over their school's decision to host the function in Islam's holiest month.

The school is now revisiting its decision to host its matric farewell on September 15 - two days into Ramadaan, and a new date will be set, according to reports.

But that’s not enough for the stifled Muslims.

Appleby said the issue was not whether the matric ball was hosted during the month of Ramadaan, but that matric balls were not endorsed within the Islamic faith…..He said that, from a religious perspective, matric balls were not endorsed by the clergy for numerous reasons.

These included a non-Islamic dress code, possible exposure to alcohol, intermingling of male and female students, intimate dancing, the atmosphere and the dangers associated with the after-party. He said that matric balls were "frowned upon" within Islam.

"Its entire format or its unfolding, the whole theme of extravagance and the utilising of funds for one evening, generally goes against Islamic teachings, or is not promoted or encouraged."

Oh God forbid that the youngsters who worked so hard to graduate should have little fun celebrating their achievement.

"It's more about the complexities of living in society or relating to what is considered sacred. It's not about the month, it's about applying the laws to their personal lives. People need to remember that, when they look at the laws of Islam, they need to be respected."

Weekend reports said that out of 159 SACS matriculants more than 25 Muslim pupils would have to choose between the farewell and their faith.

But after an intervention from the
Western Cape education minister, Cameron Dugmore, the date of the dance will be changed to accommodate Muslim pupils.

This change will mean finding an alternative venue for the matric ball as the school hall is booked a year in advance for a range of activities.

It’s the same old thing. Accommodate the Muslims and inconvenience the rest of us. But the god of multiculturalism must once again be appeased.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Storm Track Intimidation: Muslims Offended Once Again

Do you find this woman offensive?


Some Muslims in Australia do.

Twenty-three-year-old journalist Latika Bourke was verbally attacked by a group of Muslim men outside a Sydney mosque because of her dress.

"This young man approached me and said: 'You should be wearing more clothes. You need to cover up, you mutt','' Ms Bourke, who works for 2UE Radio, recounted. Ms Bourke, who was wearing a black trench coat, knee-high boots and gloves, said she was shocked and humiliated. "I'm just incredulous as to why they would say that ... what else is there to cover up?

Ms Bourke was waiting to interview controversial mufti Sheik Taj Eldeen Alhilaly at Lakemba mosque when a man aged about 20 confronted her. His friends stood nearby, supporting him, as he verbally attacked her. "He said: Are you aware that this is our Friday prayers? Do you know you're disrespecting our religion.''

Ms Bourke said she replied: "I'm sorry, how?'' He then advised her to cover up and called her "a mutt''.” I knew it was important to cover up when you go to a mosque and that's why I wore a long coat and gloves. "As soon as it happened I looked at myself and thought, what am I wearing that is offensive?'''

Why can’t Muslims, in the words of Rodney King, “Just get along”? Imagine an Amish visiting New York and finding automobiles and electric billboards offensive to their beliefs and making a fuss over it. The news would have a heyday humiliating their position. It’s time we start doing that to fundamental Muslims who can’t live in the modern world. Maybe if we ridiculed their behavior with a good horse laugh (which the main stream media and entertainment industry seems to have no problem doing to fundamentalist Christians) they will cease their constant whining and complaining and just get on with their lives.

It seems to some bitter Muslims, the entire world is offensive. Maybe some day they will wake up and discover that their offensiveness is offensive – to everyone else.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Winds of War: Help Wanted – Jihadists Needed

Ever wonder how a budding jihadist fresh from his indoctrination in Islamism finds work after graduating? Then check out Jose Padilla’s al-Qaeda application form. That’s right. Like any other organization you have to fill out an app for Allah’s HR Department. From the Dinocrat.

If you have never taken the opportunity to review an al-Qaeda job application form, you should check out Jose Padilla’s. It’s full of odd, sometimes entertaining, bits, which would be pretty funny if it weren’t for the annoying fact that these people want to kill us.

The questionnaire also asks “how much of the Quran did you memorize,” and “Under which sheikh did you study?” Most questions require an answer. “How is your security status in your country” is an optional question, however.

Hmm. I didn’t see any check box for religious preference. I guess they assume the applicant is Muslim.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Friday, May 25, 2007

Storm Track Disinformation: The YouTube Jihad

Ever wonder why videos critical of Islam disappear from YouTube? This might be the answer. This email was circulated among YouTube users encouraging the formation of a private group to promote Islam through gaming YouTube's favorites system: Hat Tip to NewsBusters.

Date: May 14, 2007, 11:18 AM
Subject: salam

to all muslim brothers and sisters please read

Our Islamic videos will not get full attention unless they come in the top ranked videos in youtube. For this purpose we all Muslims have to rate the videos to 5 stars and have to add them to our favorites. This will not be achieved if we Muslim Youtubers are scattered, i.e., one muslim rating one video and other muslim rating another. So we have to be highly organized. We will do a massive campaign of focusing to rate a single video collectively at once, so that it can show up on the top videos at least in the “Today’s top videos” list.

Doing this job in an open broadcast or in a public group is not a good idea. So it should be done in a private group. I have made the private group with the name: Burn the Boats. The group URL is in accordance to its goal as:

http://www.youtube.com/group/actnow

How to act immediately?

1- If a memeber wants a video to rate 5 stars and to be added as favorite video and to add a comment in video, then he will send the video link as:

Good Video: [video link here.....]

2- If a memeber wants a video to rate to 1 star and as an inappropriate video, then he will send the video link as :

Bad Video: [video link here...]

(Link sender must mention if it should be rated as hatespeech or graphical violence etc.)

#### Please propagate this message to the youtubers who are confirmed to be Muslims. ###

Do not send this message to any person who you doubt if he is Muslim or not. Any brother/sister who wants an invitation to the group, he can send me a short personal message.

JazakAllah.


A search at YouTube for the name of this group reveals where the title comes from: Burn the Boats.

Tariq bin Ziyad, he led the muslims to conquer spain and bring islam to europe. With his back to the Mediterranean Sea and a seemingly overwhelming force in front of him, Tariq gave the unthinkable order to his men to ‘burn their boats.’ His army’s only means of escape.

Tariq’s strategy of burning his boats did three things. Firstly, he was now committed to either victory or death. Secondly, it caused his men to focus totally on the job at hand. Thirdly, it scared the hell out of the Spanish. What sort of crazy men burn their boats in the face of overwhelming odds?"


The Spanish scared? They probably laughed their asses off. Or perhaps this act of ‘craziness’ was sign of Muslim behavior to come – suicide in the name of Allah.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Tomorrow on The Gathering Storm Radio Show

Our special guest joining Always On Watch and myself on the The Gathering Storm Radio Show will be Allan Goldstein – a Libertarian Liberal who will discuss with us ‘Liberalism in the 21st Century’. Where it is today and where it should be going in the next century.

We will also be discussing the new immigration bill with a surprise call-in guest from Homeland Security.

Should make for a very interesting show so tune in.

CALL IN LIVE at (646) 915-9870 for comments, questions or just to air your spleen!

Click here to listen 5/25, from Noon to 1PM PST

links to this post

Storm Track Infiltration: Jihad on the Streets of America

Leave it to the main stream media to practically ignore a growing trend in the US - Jihad activities going on right here in River City. From the Northeast Intelligence Network.

First, a Muslim man “training for combat” is sentenced to 10 months in jail.

19 May 2007: Pakistani student and Taliban recruit Shiraz Syed QAZI, 26, serves as yet another example that Muslim men, intent on engaging in acts of Islamic jihad, are training for war right here inside the United States. Shiraz Syed QAZI, a Pakistani student in the U.S. who was found guilty of possession of a firearm by an alien during a trial in January, was sentenced on Thursday to ten-(10) months in jail, after which he is likely to be deported. He has already served just under six months in jail which will be credited to his sentence.

According to authorities, QAZI and three other Muslim men went on a paramilitary training outing in 2005 outside of Houston, Texas. Under federal law, it is illegal for a nonimmigrant with a student visa like QAZI to own or possess firearms or ammunition. He was convicted after a brief non-jury trial in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal.

Two of the other men, Adnan Babar MIRZA and Kobie Diallo WILLIAMS, were charged with conspiracy to join the Taliban and fight U.S. forces based on admissions made before, during and after the “camping trip,” which was decidedly paramilitary training by Muslim men “preparing for war.” The men were photographed by a government informant firing and holding guns during the outing.


Next, St. Louis area men charged with firearms violations.

"We’re talking about professional Muslim men, mosque leaders, leaders within our communities who are actually helping young men train for the eventuality of urban combat. They know what they are doing, yet they lie right to our faces about these activities… and we’re told by our supervisors that we have to accept what they tell us at face value when they know damn well they are lying." –Federal source, speaking on condition of anonymity.

17 May 2007: Our report referenced the federal indictment unsealed the previous day naming Mousa M. ABUELAWI, 22 as one of eight Muslim men as defendants in a case involving the buying, selling or hiding of automatic weapons, an anti-personnel mine and other explosives. While we received some criticism that we were being broadly “alarmist” and over-stating the threat, federal authorities announced yesterday that seven-(7) additional Muslim men or adherents to the jihadist ideology have been charged in the weapons procurement scheme.

According to the indictment, Abuelawi bought a M-16 rifle and a
Claymore mine from a government informant in November 2006, and also purchased a Heckler & Koch MP5 fully automatic submachine gun and another M-16 on December 27, 2006.

Defendant Thaer Abde SUMAD, 23, succinctly stated: "We're going to war." If convicted of the charges, the men could spend ten-(10) years in federal prison. The irony of the prison term, according to analysts of the Northeast Intelligence Network, is that if convicted and while incarcerated, the men will have unfettered access to Muslim imams – largely unscreened for their political and ideological beliefs - who could be sympathetic to the more fundamentalist Wahabbi ideology, which is something that could be a factor upon their release.

Just wonderful! We lock terrorists up then provide them with further ideological indoctrination and training.

It was Lenin who said that the West will sell the USSR the rope to hang them with. Today, we’re providing – free of charge – access to the ideology that wants to kill us while at the same time allowing the jihadists to recruit, indoctrinate and train the very army that will very soon create havoc in this country killing innocent civilians in the name of Allah supported by a large number of ‘moderate’ Muslims in the US.

"Most U.S. Muslims Reject Suicide Bombings" (AP)

That’s the good news. Now the bad news.

Keep in mind that there are an estimated 2.35 million Muslims living in the U.S. "13% believe that suicide bombings against civilians... to defend Islam... are justified, at least sometimes." That means 305,000 U.S. Muslims believe that suicide bombings against civilians are justified.

Comforting, isn’t it? Now go back to sleep, America.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Storm Track Infiltration: Fusing Propaganda and Math – Islamic Style

The jihad school in Brooklyn has gotten much press in bloggosphere this past month. Here is a recent development.

May 21, 2007 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - In a recent interview with the Brooklyn Paper Dhabah Almontaser, principal designate of the proposed Khalil Gibran International Academy, stated:

"What will be different [is that] we will be able to infuse historical information into math and science and literature...With any foreign language you engage in, you need to learn the history, culture and customs of the people in order to navigate the language effectively and not offend anyone."

In response to a question of how "historical information" will be infused into "math...science and literature" she said:

"In math, as you know, algebra originated from the Arab world. So, we'll look at the historic background of algebra."

This is indicative of the revisionist pro-Arabist perspective that Khalil Gibran will display under Almontaser's leadership. It will be politicized education reinforced by the coterie of Islamist groups who are affiliated with the school and who will seek similar influence on KGIA's educational methodology.


True. The apologists for Islam like to quote chapter and verse on the scientific developments given to the West by Islam. The fact is, it’s not true.

If there was a "father" of algebra is was Diophantus of Alexandria, a Greek who was born around 200 and died nearly 85 years later. The discipline was influenced by others who were working in this field including Indian mathematicians who developed the idea of zero - it is important to note that Arab supremacists have also attempted to claim ownership of this important concept.

While there can be no doubt that Babylonian [present day Iraq] mathematicians were also working in this area and made contributions, to make the broad claim that "algebra originated from the Arab world" looms as the type of political mindset that will be on full display when and if Khalil Gibran becomes a reality.


Reminds me of the days of the USSR when scientific advancements were mentioned, they were attributed to Marxists and or Soviets.

And what about the New York Department of Education? Will they allow this kind of propaganda be exposed to young minds?

Because of Mayor Bloomberg’s heavy-handed presence in this matter [assigning Deputy Mayor Dennis Walcott the job of enforcer] and with DOE's attempts to steamroll Boerum Hill's parents into submission, the public has become rightly skeptical over statements coming out of “official" sources.

There is a lockdown mentality that defines the DOE's attitude at this point with spokesperson Meyers having failed to answer numerous telephone and email requests for clarifications regarding Khalil Gibran from these writers. New York’s DOE has even taken the unprecedented step of gagging its own administrators, instructing them to make no public comments on KGIA.


And of course dhimmitude plays an important role in the DOE’s response.

Looking at the level of discussion surrounding the question of this school, especially that coming out of DOE, the Mayor’s office and the teacher’s unions, the defects of the multicultural/diversity at any price mindset become apparent. This philosophy hamstrings intellectual exchange in such matters because it considers asking questions as to cultural predilections and relevant historical fact outside the bounds of propriety, viewing them as inherently racist.

The school will teach the Arabic language from 3-5 PM every day after school That’s more time than any other subject taught at the school posing a real concern.

Furthermore it's foolish to ignore the fact that Arabic is the language of the Quran, and that fluency in Arabic is looked upon by those who engage in da'wa as a prerequisite to greater understanding of Islam and as such is highly supported by Islamists worldwide.

Finally there is the realization that there are as Almontaser states, "millions of dollars in federal funding that are available to education systems to teach Arabic."

At this late stage the first rule of political behavior - "follow the money" - becomes operative.


But we are dealing with an educated leadership in New York – right? Wrong!

Randi Weingarten - a new and powerful supporter of KGIA - the president of the New York City teacher's union, was recently in the words of the New York Times, "left flummoxed by a question about fractions on a radio show."

Weingarten was confronted by the pop-quiz while appearing on a WNYC radio talk show during which host, Mike Pesca asked her, "What is 1/3 plus 1/4?" The teacher's union president was unable to answer the question and stated that she would have to write the problem [sixth grade level] down on paper before she could answer it. Another guest on the program quickly and correctly provided the answer, 7/12ths.

Perhaps no shame should accrue to this lapse since most of Weingarten's charges - New York City’s school children - display the same level of ignorance.


Keeping the dhimmi ignorant of the Islamist agenda is an important tactic of the Islamists. They have a great start in Brooklyn dhimmifying our children.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Storm Track Infiltration: Jihad TV in Ohio

An Ohio cable TV company is promoting terrorist propaganda.

Block Communications, which owns the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, is now airing the Al-Jazeera English channel on its Buckeye Cable System in Toledo, Ohio. The channel is the sister station of the controversial Arab-language news network Al-Jazeera, which some call the "Jihad Channel."

Not everyone is enamored with the decision. Block Chairman Allan Block recently told Multichannel News, a cable and telecommunications industry trade publication, that he received a letter saying, "I should be prosecuted because I'm a traitor in wartime."


Yes. That’s an accurate description of Block Chairman’s behavior.

The move also has been criticized by Accuracy in Media, a Washington, D.C.- based nonprofit media watchdog group. AIM editor Cliff Kincaid told Multichannel News that Block "is going to have to take the heat" for deciding to air the station.

"We've heard from a number of people in his area who think he's aiding the enemy," Kincaid said. "He's got a significant Arab-Muslim population there, and I think he's going to increase the anti-American sentiments of those people."


Pursuing the almighty buck rather than considering national security. When will we wake up and start enforcing sedition laws in this country?

Some more background on Al-Jazeera’s infiltration.

Joining the ranks of CNN as a national cable channel will not be easy. A deal between al Jazeera and a major U.S. cable provider fell apart over differences about whether the channel would be carried throughout the country, or only in regions with large Arab and Muslim communities. Americans can still watch al Jazeera English on the Internet. But as for watching it on the TV screen, only two small cable companies took a chance on the fledgling network: a city-operated system in Burlington, Vermont, and the cable provider serving Toledo, Ohio.

Most Americans, pummeled by political correctness, disinformation from the main stream media, and the stain of multiculturalism, are blind to how Islamists are using our very own freedoms against us.

One of the few exceptions is John Parrish. He knows what al Jazeera is, didn't know its English channel was on cable in Toledo, but says he really doesn't mind either way. "It's a free country," he points out, "freedom of speech, different point of view. I can't see anything wrong with it. If you don't want to watch it, then turn it off."

Yeah. What harm could it do? If you don’t like American Idol, turn it off. But some Americans don’t buy the ruse.

But others in the city question whether al Jazeera should be available in the U.S. at all. Many echo the thoughts of Toledoan Ed Raymer, a truck driver who says he was passing through New York City on September 11th, when the terrorist attacks occurred.

At a downtown bar, he insists Americans don't need to hear the views of Arabs who are at war with the U.S. "I can see it being okay for the Arab community," he says, "but everybody else, with what's going on over there, shouldn't be subjected to it."

His friend Phil Lazuski predicts, "It's gonna cause a big chaos. If it comes here, it's gonna cause a big chaos."

Lazuski is one of many TV viewers who is not aware that Al Jazeera has already come to Toledo, and has already led to a few angry letters to the editor calling for local subscribers to cancel their cable service.


While America sleeps.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Monday, May 21, 2007

Winds of War: Straight From the Camel’s, uh, Jihadist Mouth.

The Democrats and Leftists have been beating the inane drum of how we are creating more terrorists by fighting on the global front of Islamism in Iraq. You really can’t expect any kind of educated analysis from those who are a product of a liberal education system. But that’s another story.

Let’s see what the enemy thinks about the Iraq front against the Islamist Jihadists because if the Left actually thought about the meaning of the war they may find that the Jihadists don’t agree with their analysis as this jihadist fighting in Iraq tells us.

“In regards to the bill in the U.S. Congress for the upcoming withdrawal from Iraq, I would comment that this is a normal response to what is occurring. It is the result of the efforts of your brothers among the mujahideen... our next step... is to establish an Islamic State. We will start by setting free all of the Muslim lands from the oppressor regimes. Of course, we have not forgotten about Palestine, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Andalusia [Spain], the Philippines, and all the other countries… The Islamic State of Iraq is seeking to export the jihad to neighboring countries... The jihad that began in Muslim Afghanistan and then spread to Iraq shall not stop there and will not be limited by any border... The Islamic State of Iraq will make sure the jihad will not stop until it reaches Jerusalem... We inform the Jews, we inform the lowlife Olmert, and we inform the apostate [Arab] rulers who support them that the jihad is here, Islam is here, and the followers of the Prophet are here."

Got that dhimmicrats?

Of course not. To them and the moonbats that support them what we have is just a “small minority” of jihadists braying that they will takeover the world now and like in 1939, and training the next generation to hate now and like in 1939, and using intimidation and thuggery worldwide now and like in 1939.

Get the picture, Dhimmicrats?

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Winds of War: The Ummah As a Supra-National State

What all pundits on the Left and most political analysts on the Right miss is the relationship between Muslims and the Ummah. Both can’t seem to get it through their knobby heads that Muslims see themselves belonging not to the nation the live in whether it be Islamic or non-Islamic, but to the Ummah – the world-wide community of Muslims or the nation of Islam.

This belief is no secret. Muslims openly admit that theirs is a supra-national identity that demands loyalty beyond any nation state.

Addressing the closing session of the 34th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers, Prime Minister (Shaukat Aziz of Pakistan) asked the Ummah to show solidarity and unity to respond to the challenges facing them on all political, social, economic and cultural issues.

He said the conference was held "at a critical period for the entire Muslim Ummah" when collectively and individually as countries, it was facing a range of grave challenges and risks. The Muslim world, he said, not only faces challenges but also has numerous opportunities and needs unity and commonality of purpose to work for collective good of the Ummah.

Prime Minister Aziz said there was also a need to reconcile differences among Islamic States and peoples. "We shall oppose all schemes to divide the Muslim Ummah," he emphasized.


Remember – this is the same conference that stated that Islamaphobia was the "worst form of terrorism in the world today" which they further defined as any criticism of Islam. When even their leadership sees the Ummah as a supra-national state dictated by the law of Sharia, it’s easy to understand that it’s us against them. Democracy against totalitarianism, freedom against tyranny.

Read THE GATHERING STORM eBook (with an Introduction by ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat) that contains 300 pages of hyperlinked information, pictures, cartoons and videos that details the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics Islamists are using to advance their goal of the Islamic rule of the world.

links to this post

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Storm Track Disinformation: What The Left Has Not Learned From History

The attempts at painting parallels of imperialism between current day America and the colonial powers of old is a common theme among the Left who continuously apologize for real imperialism conducted under the banner of Marxism and Communism and their poster child Stalin and his ilk.

The latest attempt that’s getting wide fawning by the MSM is a recent book by William Dalrymple entitled The Last Mughal: The Fall of a Dynasty, Delhi, 1857. What’s telling about the book is the conspicuous analysis of the revolt in Muslim vs Christian terms and the utter lack of morals displayed by the Left in service to their neurotic belief in modern day American imperialism that see the free market of capitalism as imperialistic.

Briefly, what started as an act of defiance by some Indian soldiers who refused to use rifle bullets said to be greased with beef and pork fat (a rumor never substantiated spread by anti-British agents) quickly became a popular rebellion against the British East India Company that ruled most of India. Muslims consider pork unclean while Hindus view the cow as holy.

Dalrymple uses this historic rebellion as a tool to berate America’s recent foray into Iraq.

It is one thing to conquer a country. It is quite another to stay there and try to force-feed your ideas to a part of the world that has its own traditions.

And what are the ‘traditions’ that needed to be defended. In his article in Time magazine Dalrymple is sparse on his explanation yet what he does say is telling.

What lay behind the uprising? The British, through the East India Company, had been trading in India since the early 17th century. But the commercial relationship changed toward the end of the 18th century as the authority of the Mughal Empire collapsed and a new group of conservatives came into power in London, determined to expand British ascendancy. Lord Wellesley, the British Governor-General from 1798 to 1805, called his new approach the Forward Policy. Wellesley made clear that he was determined to establish British dominance over all European rivals and believed it was better pre-emptively to remove hostile Muslim regimes that presumed to resist the West's growing power.

Notice how he casually throws out the term Muslim without defining what kind hostility or behavior those Muslim regimes represent. He does give a hint of it.

The Forward Policy soon developed an evangelical flavor; the plan was to impose not just British laws and technology on India but also British Christian values. That way India would be not only ruled but redeemed. Local laws that offended Christian sensibilities were abrogated. The burning of widows, for example, was banned.

Umm. Excuse me. Christian sensibilities? That sounds like Christian sensibilities are like being offended by wearing light colors in the winter months. And how about these Christian sensibilities being offended?

On the evening of Sunday 10 May 1857, 150 years ago next week, 300 mutinous sepoys from Meerut rose up against their officers. They shot as many as they could, then rode through the night to the old Mughal capital of Delhi, where there they massacred every Christian man, woman and child…..

And this comment – the most telling of all.

What is striking about so many of the proclamations coming out of the uprising's storm centre, Delhi, was the emphatically religious articulation that the rebels adopted.

A religious articulation. Know what that meant?

British men and women who had converted to Islam - and there were a surprising number of those in Delhi - were not hurt; but Indians who had converted to Christianity were cut down immediately.

Yes. Mr. Dalrymple, you are correct about how little history changes. But you are looking in the wrong direction. It’s Islam that has not changed and what we need to learn from and not the trumped up charges of Leftists that see America as an imperialist.

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post

Friday, May 18, 2007

Dr. Paul Williams on the Gathering Storm Today

Today on the The Gathering Storm Radio Show we will discuss Paul’s new book The Day of Islam. Islamic Jihadists have replaced the Soviets in the American nightmare of nuclear annihilation, and journalist/author Williams is back to report that such a scenario is closer at hand than one (or one's government) might think. Picking up where his last few titles left off (2006's Dunces of Doomsday, '05's The Al Qaeda Connection, '04's Osama's Revenge), Williams reveals the underlying narrative of news updates on terrorist activity, tying isolated acts to bin Laden's overall strategy to carry out an "American Hiroshima."

CALL IN LIVE at (646) 915-9870 for comments, questions or just to air your spleen!

Click here to listen today from Noon to 1PM PST

links to this post

Winds of War: Marx and Islamic Fundamentalists - Partners in Crime?

The ties between Marxism and Islamism are not just political. It’s almost spiritual. Theodore Dalrymple, author of the book Life at the Bottom observes the comparison between the socialist left and fundamental Islam with these observations on Karl Marx and Muslim philosopher of jihad Sayyid Qutb.

Qutb’s thought has many parallels with Marxism. Where Marx has Historical Inevitability, Qutb has God‘s Law. Marx, you remember, envisages a time when the state will wither away and history will end. In Marx’s vision, political power will have dissolved, and the exploitation of man by man will have ceased, to be replaced by the mere administration of things. (How anybody of minimal intelligence could have believed such a thing beats me.) In Qutb’s vision, all political power will have dissolved, replaced by man’s spontaneous obedience to God’s law. Just as the administration of things in Marx’s utopia will not confer power on the administrators, presumably because everything will be so plentiful that no one will be tempted to appropriate more than the next man, so in Qutb’s utopia no one will have to interpret the law and gain power from doing so. God’s law will be as evident as thing will be abundant in Marx’s classless society.

In both Marx and Qutb, the idea is expressed that, under the new dispensation, man will become more human, less animal. Personally, I have always found this kind of thought an appallingly arrogant slur on all the people who have lived before the thinker of it: does humanity really have to wait for Marx and Qutb before it becomes truly human?


OK. So far both philosophies, though out in la la land, are not necessarily threatening. But the ideologies don’t stop there.

Marx understood that the classless society could not come about by merely preaching socialism, as if it were merely an ethical demand or theory. Violence would be necessary. Similarly, Qutb denies that the world will become Islamic merely by preaching the word of God. He refers to Mohammed’s Meccan period, when the Prophet did not resort to arms. This, he says, was merely tactical; it would have been impossible in practice to impose his rule by force. But when he went to Medina, he had no hesitation in fighting his enemies, including those who simply did not accept his message.

This last piece explains very well what kind of philosophers Marx and Qutb really were.

Both Marx and Qutb are full of hatred. Of course, Qutb would have claimed to be nothing more than a humble instrument of God, expressing God’s design for humanity, just as Marx would have claimed that he was merely the mouthpiece of historical inevitability. But all is not humility that claims to be humble.

Qutb’s philosophy of Islam begins where Marx ends.

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Tomorrow on The Gathering Storm Radio Show

We have two special guests joining Always On Watch and myself on the The Gathering Storm Radio Show. Noted author Dr. Paul Williams and Shah Alexander from the Global American Discourse blog.

First we will discuss Paul’s new book The Day of Islam. Islamic Jihadists have replaced the Soviets in the American nightmare of nuclear annihilation, and journalist/author Williams is back to report that such a scenario is closer at hand than one (or one's government) might think. Picking up where his last few titles left off (2006's Dunces of Doomsday, '05's The Al Qaeda Connection, '04's Osama's Revenge), Williams reveals the underlying narrative of news updates on terrorist activity, tying isolated acts to bin Laden's overall strategy to carry out an "American Hiroshima."

Then Shah Alexander will give us a Japanese perspective on the Islam and the war.

Should make for a very interesting show so tune in.

CALL IN LIVE at (646) 915-9870 for comments, questions or just to air your spleen!

Click here to listen 4/18, from Noon to 1PM PST

links to this post

Storm Track Infiltration: Are We Losing the Online Jihad?

With the recent case of the Fort Dix Six and other revelations of home-grown terrorist, the Internet as a jihadist tool has become more and more visible. The Northeast Intelligence Network explored how deep this rabbit hole goes and the infectious threat to our security.

In the world of Internet jihad and the dissemination of information and propaganda, there are various levels of "navigation." There are the top ranked al Qaeda forums that are password protected - only a limited number of those who investigate terrorism on the Internet can even wiggle their way into these sites. There are the terrorist Blog sites, and then, of course, are the terrorist and "insurgent" groups sites that are on the Internet just as if they were a legitimate business. The latter are particularly upsetting to me, as they are so easy to take down and dismantle, yet we aren’t doing it. There is essentially no official action being taken against these sites that serve as virtual terrorist training camps for any terrorists-in-training with access to a computer.

I’ll list a few here, all of which are quite public and easy to find if you simply look for them. They are all listed in the major search engines, so there are no secrets being divulged by providing this information. Here are just a few examples:

http://iraqsawthaq.blogspot.com/
Note the recent date, so it’s safe to say this site is active.

http://inshallahshaheed.wordpress.com/
This Jihād is the honor of Islām and it is the way to victory for Islām;

http://www.iraqiasaeb.org/absartna/
Official website of an insurgent group operating in Iraq;

http://islamiciraq.modawanati.com/
This is a good place to pick up the latest films from Islamic State of Iraq, no password required;

http://arabic.jaamiiraq.com/
The official website of insurgent group Jami aka Jaami [Salahaldin Al-Ayoubi Brigades];

http://www.nasrunminallah.net/
The official website of insurgent group Jaish al-Mujahideen, a/k/a Army of the Mujahideen;

http://theislamsun.com/rashedeen/
The official website of Jaish al-Rashideen.

This above list is just a very limited example of the thousands upon thousands of Islamic terrorist websites, Blogs and forums that exist and thrive on the Internet and are allowed to exist and operate completely unmolested by the authorities. Personally, I have bookmarked over 6,000 jihad websites over the last six years. This isn’t a mystery and this certainly isn’t classified information. The very sad part is that anyone can go to most of these sites without the necessity of passwords or registering, collect information, instructions on a number of terrorist topics, and vanish without a trace.


The author gives some disturbing examples of this unhindered online Jihad.

In one celebrated case, Islamic terrorists have used the name of the children's film "Finding Nemo" to hide and disseminate terrorist training manuals and films. While I will not identify the URL to the unprotected website that contains the complete set of "NEMO manuals," they can be found with relative ease. If you search properly, the chances are good that you too can find them in a relatively short period of time.

So why aren’t the authorities doing something about these site. The appeasers and apologists have no qualms of outing this blogs and news sites and videos that they claim are Islamophobes. That seems to be of prominent importance to them.

If there is an explosion, a subway bombing or plane hijacking, you can bet that professional and amateur researchers and analysts, the media, and even some government researchers will look everywhere EXCEPT for the actual source of the training manuals, training films, and other important documents of value.

The ironic part is many of these sites are based and hosted on American servers, right here and here and here in the USA.

Want to try and find them yourself? Then do this. Enter the Arabic translation of the word "Jihad" into Google. This is it:

الجهاد

You will see literally thousands of listings. Use the Google translation engine for the pages and see a window onto the world of Jihad.

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Storm Track Appeasement: An Islamic Version of the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact

As my readers know, the theme of the my Gathering Storm Blog is the comparison between the softening up tactics of fascist Germany and Imperial Japan prior to World War II and the use of the same intimidation, infiletration and disinformation tactics used by the Islamists of today. Last week, a caller to the Gathering Storm Radio Show brought up another interesting comparison.

The comparisons might shed some light on why Russia defends the actions of Iran which in reality is a threat to Russian security.

Our caller compared the friendly relations between Russia and Iran similar to the friendly relations between Russia and Nazi Germany prior to 1940 even though both ideologies were in conflict with each other. The caller said that Russia is quite aware of the dangers posed by Islamists on their southern borders and in the breakaway states of the former USSR. So why the support for Iran in the world community?

Perhaps, the caller said, Russia fears, as it did Germany, Iran’s growing power and its support and influence on the jihadists in Russia’s midst. I though that was a pretty good analysis. Then this post from the The Captain’s Quarters - Hitler-Stalin For The Terror Age. He speaks of an article in the New York Sun that reports of a marriage of convenience that has begun to grow between two factions that seem entirely incompatible in all respects but one:

Over the past year, multiple international conferences have featured leaders of the anti-global left and Islamist groups working together. Go to any anti-war or anti-globalization demonstration in the West and chances are you will see the flags of Hezbollah and Hamas waved by people wearing Che Guevara T-shirts. And at some of these meetings, members of such radical Islamist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and Hezbollah have enjoyed starring roles.

The roster of Islamist-left alliances quietly grows every day: Massachusetts Institute of Technology linguistics professor Noam Chomsky praises Hamas and denounces America on Hezbollah's Al-Manar television. London Mayor Ken Livingstone invites a leading Islamist, Sheikh Yosef Al-Qaradawi, who is known for supporting suicide attacks, to visit his city. Iranian President Ahmadinejad calls for a world without America even as he plays host to a Tehran peace conference attended by American Mennonites, Quakers, Episcopalians, Methodists, and leaders of the National Council of Churches.

The key forum at this year's annual Cairo Anti-War Conference was titled "Bridge-building Between the Left and Islam," and focused on practical ways to increase cooperation. The aim of the conference sessions were described in one piece of literature as tackling "the challenges and prospects facing the international anti-war and pro-intifada movements" and planning "strategy and tactics for bridging the gap and uniting Islamist and leftist ranks in the face of U.S. imperialism and Zionism."


Could this be the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact for our age? The Captain speculates.

The Left, with its insistence on multiculturalism and the end of religion in public discourse, has begun to ally itself with the most xenophobic religion on the planet, one which insists on transcendence in temporal matters above all other law. Its leaders now praise the same groups that target and kill civilians, oppress the media, openly practice anti-Semitism, and routinely stone those who have the audacity to date without permission from their families.

A linguist like Chomsky can talk all he wants, but he cannot hide the inherent contradiction in his basis for supporting Hamas and Hezbollah while castigating the US for its cultural imperialism and religious extremism, and neither can the rest of the Left that insists on enabling the Hassan Nasrallahs of our age. They are the collaborators in this new era, the ones who give intellectual comfort to terrorists around the world. The Left has just about fully discredited itself, and it will be people like Chomsky who push it over the edge.


Back in February of this year, the Economist ran a piece on the anti-war movement in Britain where a broad anti-American alliance between Socialists and Muslims has emerged in recent years to lead opposition to the U.S.-led international order.

An Italian Marxist involved in the “Social Forum” movement, which organises large, disparate gatherings of groups opposed to the existing world order, puts it this way. Almost everybody in the movement shares the belief that “capitalism and militarism” (both epitomised by America) are the main challenges to human welfare. If political Islam can blunt American triumphalism, then so much the better—even from the viewpoint of those who would never dream of donning a headscarf or upsetting a sexual minority.

The Left would prefer to sell their souls to the devil it will prevent America from supporting freedom throughout the world. It happened in 1939, it’s happening today.

The more things change, the more they remain the same.

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Storm Track Appeasement: Blogger Justice or Leftist Justice?

I really try to believe that at the end of the day the Left is really a rational bunch. Most of my Lefty friends are. But every once in a while the moonbats within the ranks of the Left show they’re true colors.

A recent comment to a post from a liberal lefty on my blog ("Storm Track Disinformation: Terrorism? What Terrorism?") proves what I’m talking about. I was going to respond with a comment to his comment but thought such a revelation of LeftThink ‘clarity’ needed its own post.

You can read the whole comment at the post. But here’s the part the stuck me and revealed how certain Lefties really feel about the war against Islamism and how we are dealing with it.

I believe in justice here in America. I don't see any with this case. Furthermore, just because someone (Osama or whoever) claims responsibility for a crime (9/11), doesn't mean he's automatically guilty.

Huh?? I thought admitted confessions are proof positive in criminal cases. Is it the Left’s position that we’re to talk criminals out of confessions?

Criminal: “Yes, I killed him and cut up his body into tiny pieces. I’ll sign the confession and show you where I buried the parts.”

Police: “Now don’t be so hasty. You don’t want to say something that can be held against you in court.”

As Americans, we pride ourselves on impartiality. I want to see Osama brought to justice, same as Saddam, but I wouldn't let guys like you anywhere near him if he's taken into custody. I wouldn't trust you to administer justice. You're too emotional, too soft.

I see. According to the Lefty there are two kinds of justice - his and us blogger’s. But if he wants cold, calculated, unemotional and rational deliberance if OBL is caught and brought to trial, then leave it in the hands of the American justice system minus the input from bleeding heart liberals who care more for the ‘rights’ of perpetuators of a crime than the victims fate.

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post

Monday, May 14, 2007

Storm Track Appeasement: Terrorism and the Flaw in Gandhi Think

One could say the Mahatma Gandhi is the quintessential role model of the common liberal. His way of dealing with oppression was to dialogue and peacefully protest. Our own protégée of Gandhi was martin Luther King who used many of Gandhi’s tactics to bring attention to and bring about the results of the civil rights movement.

To say that the tactics of Gandhi and King were successful is an understatement. One confronted an Empire and made it conform to his ideals. The other confronted a long held bigotry and made its institutions conform to his will. Both freed their people. Liberals and Progressives forever hold these two men and the means they used in high esteem and claim that dialogue with opponents, peaceful protest and the very power of their ideals will always win over brute force, hatred and aggression.

But there is a flaw in this thinking.

Both men struggled with a fundamentally moral opponent. Their protests were not met with firing squads and their dialogue did not condemn them to concentration camps. They worked their magic of change in an environment ruled by Anglo-Saxon culture that above all recognized the value of life and the procedure of law.

The flaw in Gandhi’s thinking became quite evident during WW II when he was asked how he would respond to Hitler and the Nazis’s persecution of the Jews. David Lewis Schaefer in “What Would Gandhi Do?”

Gandhi offered only one avenue for the Jews to resist their persecution while preserving their “self-respect.” Were he a German Jew, Gandhi pronounced, he would challenge the Germans to shoot or imprison him rather than “submit to discriminating treatment.” Such “voluntary” suffering, practiced by all the Jews of Germany, would bring them, he promised, immeasurable “inner strength and joy.” Indeed, “if the Jewish mind could be prepared” for such suffering, even a massacre of all German Jews “could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy,” since “to the God-fearing, death has no terror.”

The pacifist ignores reality and substitutes it with his or her beliefs. Gandhi said of Hitler just a month before the fall of France, “I do not consider Hitler to be as bad as he is depicted. He is showing an ability that is amazing and seems to be gaining his victories without much bloodshed.”

As for his response to Muslim demands for a separate nation – Pakistan – once India received its independence from Britain, Sudaram writes in “Gandhi, the Moulana of Muslim Appeasement”:

Dr B R Ambedkar paid his tribute to the Muslim Appeasement Bible of Moulana Mahatma Gandhi in these brilliant words: 'Gandhi has never called the Muslims to account even when they have been guilty of gross crimes against Hindus. It is a notorious fact that many prominent Hindus who had offended the religious susceptibilities of the Muslims either by their writings or by their part in the Shudhi Movement have been murdered by some fanatic Musalmans. The leading Muslims never condemned these criminals. On the contrary, they were hailed as religious martyrs.... This attitude of the Muslims is understandable. What is not understandable is the attitude of Mr Gandhi.'

Dr Ambedkar was not talking through his hat about the anti-Hindu and pro-Muslim attitude of Mahatma Gandhi. When thousands of women were raped and many of them killed by the Moplah Muslims during the Moplah rebellion in 1921, the brutalised women of Malabar led by the senior Rani of Nilambur gave a heart-rending petition to Lady Reading, the wife of the then Viceroy of India. The atrocities committed by the Moplah rebels were widely reported in the English and vernacular newspapers of the day throughout India and the British Empire. Mahatma Gandhi was fully aware of every development in Malabar during this time. But his overweening egoism blinded his eyes to such an extent that he was unable to see the realities on the ground.

Gandhi was a great appeaser and showed many of the traits of appeasers and apologist over the ages. Self-loathing and the belief of being lesser than their enemies, the will of self-preservation, and the need to see their oppressors as ‘human beings’ so as to continue the fantasy that they hold the same basic ideal of humanity as they.

Mahatma Gandhi at that time gave a great finding to the effect that every Muslim is a bully and every Hindu a coward. On the one hand he called every Hindu a coward and on the other hand he exhorted all the Hindus to remain calm and non-violent even when they went all out to defend themselves against the attacking Moplah Muslims. The truth is Mahatma Gandhi displayed all his courage only to suppress the Hindus. In so far as the Muslims were concerned, he was a typical Hindu coward. He was mortally scared of them. So was Jawaharlal Nehru. Therefore Gandhi had no moral sanction to talk about the cowardice of the Hindus. And here is the callous, sadistic and barbarous message he gave to the Hindu victims of Moplah rebellion in Young India of 29 September, 1921: 'The ending of the Moplah revolt is a matter not only of urgency, but of simple humanity. The Hindus must have the courage and the faith to feel that they can protect their religion in spite of such fanatical eruptions. ... Be the Moplahs be ever so bad, they deserve to be treated as human beings.'

Today’s liberal appeasers and apologists should earn from the lesson of Gandhi. He was murdered by the very same ‘human beings’ he held in high esteem.

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Storm Track Disinformation: Orthodox or Moderate, Islamist Ideology is Still the Same

A recent leftist rant in BlogCritics Magazine tried – again – to place the radicalization of Muslims on our attempts to defend ourselves against the Salafist elements of Islam. What the writer fails to understand is that it’s not Salafist or any other orthodox form of Islam that threatens our world today but the ideology that individual Muslims hold that poses the danger.

In other words, not all branches of fundamental Islam advocate violence, but all contribute to the process of radicalization. The article is perfect example of this willful or unconscious misunderstanding. It’s just and another form of disinformation that Islam’s useful idiots spew on a daily basis.

This is from Asma Khalid, a Muslim woman pursuing her master's degree in Middle Eastern/Islamic studies at the University of Cambridge, England and proves my point. The ignorance of her position is telling.

I am a Muslim who embraces peace. But, if we must attach stereotypical tags, I'd rather be considered "orthodox" than "moderate." "Moderate," in this context, implies that Muslims who are more orthodox are somehow backward and violent and that, in our current cultural climate, progress and peace are restricted to "moderate" Muslims. To be a "moderate" Muslim is, thus, to be a "good," malleable Muslim in the eyes of Western society.

Notice her choice of words – a moderate must be a “malleable Muslim”. By malleable does she mean adhering to modern concepts of personal freedoms, civil rights, and secular government? I think so because…

True orthodoxy is simply the attempt to adhere piously to a religion's tenets.

In her eyes do those religious tenets supersede the hard earned Western tenets of freedom and democracy? And by supporting her fundamental orthodox Salafist religious tenets, tenets that drives Muslim violence throughout the world, isn’t she contributing to the process of radicalization? Ms. Khalid, the end result of your pious adherence to your religious tenets leads to this. From the Pedestrian Infidel.

In Malaysia, the JAKIM (Islamic Affairs Department or the dreaded Morality Police) arrest people for kissing. Then they steal dead bodies from their grieving families. Then they harass foreign tourists in the middle of the night and demand 'proof of religion' documentation. And they hold innocent people indefinitely on the grounds of "religious rehabilitation." Now, Malaysia's Taliban has opted for a new 'enforcement tactic' - the kidnapping of entire families.

The writer of the article ends her diatribe against America’s need for self-defense with this showing of her unbelievable defense of extremism.

If the U.S. wants to continue fighting every Muslim who does not fall into their category as a moderate Muslim, either because they follow a particular strand of the religion or don't agree with the U.S.' actions in and policies for Muslim countries, then they will be fighting forever. I just hope they realize that having an extreme belief in true Islam does not make you a terrorist, before a "clash of civilizations" becomes a dreadful reality.

BUZZ!! WRONG!! It’s not an extreme belief in true Islam that makes a Muslim the enemy of modern civilization but the ideology of Islamism that he or she holds that distinguishes them as a Jihadist – either the violent or non-violent kind.

In a nutshell – it’s the ideology, stupid!

Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

links to this post